When Fear Becomes the Governing Force

Advocacy Lobbying & Political Activity
Written By Nancy Durand, Esq.

Nonprofit leaders are making difficult decisions in an environment where political pressure, regulatory uncertainty, and public scrutiny can make even lawful mission activity feel risky. In this article, our founder explains why fear should not become a substitute for legal analysis and why nonprofit leaders need to distinguish actual legal restrictions from ideological pressure or intimidation.

The article clarifies the boundaries around advocacy, lobbying, political campaign intervention, and lawful mission expression, while offering practical questions and preparedness steps that help boards govern from clarity rather than anxiety. The central message is simple: strategic restraint may sometimes be appropriate, but fear-driven retreat is not the same as responsible governance.

Read the full article on Substack and subscribe to The Bright Line Standard to receive new articles directly in your inbox.

Nancy Durand, Esq.

Nancy Durand, Esq. is the founder of Good Works Legal Solutions and a nonprofit attorney with more than 20 years of legal experience. Her work helps nonprofit leaders understand the legal and governance responsibilities that shape their organizations and translate that knowledge into thoughtful, practical stewardship.

Through Good Works, Nancy brings together nonprofit law, governance, and real-world organizational experience to help leaders make sound decisions, strengthen governance practices, and steward their missions with clarity, wisdom, and integrity.

Previous

Is the Legal Industry Failing the Nonprofit Sector?
Next

Downsizing with Care: Ethical Layoffs in Nonprofits When Harm Is Unavoidable