The Board That Finally Got Its Act Together

A nonprofit board trying to recover from years of weak governance moved quickly to rebuild itself, only to discover that good intentions could not substitute for legal authority and process. In this case study, our founder walks through how informal assumptions about resignation, board vacancies, and meeting authority ultimately caused a court to invalidate the election of new directors and everything that followed.

The article shows how ordinary governance gaps can become serious legal consequences when bylaws are ignored, records are incomplete, and leaders act before confirming who actually holds authority. The central lesson is that strong stewardship depends on governance infrastructure that is clear, current, and used before a decision is challenged.

Read the full article on Substack and subscribe to our newsletter to receive new articles directly in your inbox.

Nancy Durand, Esq.

Nancy Durand, Esq. is the founder of Good Works Legal Solutions and a nonprofit attorney with more than 20 years of legal experience. Her work helps nonprofit leaders understand the legal and governance responsibilities that shape their organizations and translate that knowledge into thoughtful, practical stewardship.

Through Good Works, Nancy brings together nonprofit law, governance, and real-world organizational experience to help leaders make sound decisions, strengthen governance practices, and steward their missions with clarity, wisdom, and integrity.